|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- General Revelation
- Special Revelation
- How the Bible Reveals
- Inscripturation
|
|
4
|
- Dictation
- Intuition, Illumination, Elevation
- Dynamic / Plenary
- Prophetic Model
- Concursive Action
- Psychological Emphasis
- Social Theories
|
|
5
|
- The Bible as a whole was accomplished by an extraordinary stimulation
and elevation of the powers of men who devoutly yielded themselves to
God’s will, and sought, often with success unparalleled elsewhere, to
convey truth useful to the salvation of men and of nations. - L. Harold DeWolf
|
|
6
|
- On a human level we can describe . . . the various oral and literary
processes . . . the use of written sources, the writing up and editing
of such information, . . . the collecting of various documents together,
and so on. At the same time,
however, on the divine level we can assert that the Spirit, . . . was
active in the whole process so that the Bible can be regarded as both
the words of men and the Word of God.
This activity of the Spirit can be described as ‘concursive’ with
the human activities through which the Bible was written. - I.
Howard Marshall
|
|
7
|
- Power of Language
- William Abraham’s Relational Inspiration
- 2 Timothy 3:16-17 - theopneustos
|
|
8
|
- All scripture is inspired by God (theopneustos) and is useful for
teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in
righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient,
equipped for every good work.
|
|
9
|
- Interpretation
- Authority
- Community
|
|
10
|
- Authority is the ability to shape thought and behavior
- Authority is always communal and contextual
- Authority is always relational
- Genuine authority is tacit – it does not trumpet itself – it simply is
|
|
11
|
- Coercive Authority – authority by power
- Compelling Authority – authority by expertise – eyewitness, expert,
professional
- Persuasive Authority – authority by logic and rational argument
- Authentic Authority – authority that is inherent and self-authenticating
|
|
12
|
- When the Bible produces a sense of identity and hope
- When the Bible produces a set of norms for belief and behavior
- When the Bible produces a way of knowing where you stand – that you
belong in the community of faith
- When the Spirit bears witness with your spirit that the Scripture
produces the above for you
|
|
13
|
- In doctrine – Via the so-called quadrilateral
- In worship – Evangelicals tend to be weak
- In Christian Formation – the biblical story shaping identity and forming
persons
- In Community Formation – the biblical story shaping identity and forming
community
- In Ethics – personal, ecclesial, social
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Canon appears to have arisen in response to some need of the community.
- Canon was a community product reached by community processes.
- This necessitated slow development.
- The concept of canon was always clearer after each step than before and
during its development.
|
|
16
|
- Torah (often translated Law)
- Nebi’im (Prophets)
- Kethubim (Writings)
- The Hebrew Bible is now called TaNaK (or Tanaach) by Jews after the
three consonants of the three parts.
|
|
17
|
- Consists of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy
- Traditional authorship by Moses, but evidence of later editing.
- Documentary hypotheses date the Torah to early post-exilic
- Perhaps achieved canonical status in post-exilic period (Ezra and
Nehemiah)
|
|
18
|
- Former Prophets
- Joshua
- Judges
- Samuel
- Kings
- Later Prophets
- Isaiah
- Jeremiah
- Ezekiel
- The Twelve (equals what are commonly called the Minor Prophets now)
|
|
19
|
- Notice the historical/prophetic interface.
- Samuel and Kings were apparently a single book in Hebrew.
- Notice that Daniel was not a part of the prophets in the Hebrew canon.
- We have little idea how the Nebi’im achieved canonical status, but it
generally assumed to have happened by 200 B.C.
|
|
20
|
- Now include: Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs,
Lamentations, Daniel, Ruth, Esther, Ezra-Nehemiah, Chronicles
- Vague references to this 3rd division of the canon appear in Sirach,
Luke 24:44, and Josephus
- Discussion of some of these books continued until Jamnia c. A.D. 90
|
|
21
|
- The existence of the Septuagint with the apocryphal or deutero-canonical
books.
- The existence of the Samaritan Pentateuch and the Sadducee’s acceptance
of only the Torah
- The presence of Jubilees, 1 Enoch, etc. among the Dead Sea Scrolls
- Evidence of MT and LXX vorlages among the Dead Sea Scrolls
|
|
22
|
- 1. Collection of Pauline Epistles
- 2. Collection of the Four Gospels
- 3. Responding to the threat of
Marcion
- 4. Period of agreement about
20-21 books and disagreement about 10 books
- 5. Appearance of canonical lists
with the present 27 books
- 6. Residual resistance
|
|
23
|
- No earlier than A.D. 80, possibly as late as A.D. 125.
- May not have included the pastoral epistles.
- John Knox proposed that Onesimus (of Philemon) became a bishop around
A.D. 80, collected the Pauline letters, and composed Ephesians as an
introduction to Pauline theology.
|
|
24
|
- Usually thought to have occurred around A.D. 125, though could have been
as much as 50 years later
- Involved the separation of Acts from Luke
- The order varied - Matthew was always first, but sometimes Mark and John
changed positions.
|
|
25
|
- Approximately A.D. 145 Marcion began preaching in Rome and using a New
Testament “canon” consisting of an edited form of Luke and 10 letters of
Paul (no Pastoral epistles)
- It is frequently conjectured that Marcion’s canon motivated the orthodox
church to respond with canonical development.
|
|
26
|
- If Marcion motivated the church to action the first step was to combine
the gospels and the Pauline letter collection
- It is likely that the book of Acts was then placed between the Gospel
and the epistles as a kind of hinge.
- One could conjecture this development by A.D. 165.
|
|
27
|
- Raised in Asia Minor, taught by Polycarp, disciple of John, made bishop
of Lyons in Gaul in A.D. 180
- Attests the four gospels, Acts, 12 Pauline epistles (no Philemon), 1
Peter, 1 John, and Revelation
|
|
28
|
- C. A.D. 180 (or later) and fragmentary at the front.
- Mentions Luke as the 3rd gospel and then John implying Matthew and Mark
- Then Acts, 13 Pauline epistles, Jude, 1 and 2 John, the Apocalypse of
John, and the Apocalypse of Peter
- Shepherd of Hermas worthy to be read but not apostolic
|
|
29
|
- Alexandria - A.D. 220-230
- Lists the four gospels, Acts, 13 epistles of Paul, 1 Peter, 1 John, and
Revelation as accepted by all Christians
- Lists Hebrews, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, James, Jude, Epistle of Barnabas,
The Shepherd of Hermas, the Didache, and the Gospel of the Hebrews as
disputed by some
- Lists a large number rejected by all
|
|
30
|
- First list with the exact 27 accepted today comes in A.D. 367 in Bishop
Athanasius’ Easter letter to the churches of Alexandria.
- Church Council action followed in the Synod of Hippo in A.D. 393 which
is the first “official” designation of the New Testament canon
|
|
31
|
- All of the Bible was written before the invention of printing – thus all
parts of the Bible were transmitted for more than 1000 years by making
hand copies.
- This resulted in copying errors.
Many errors in the New Testament transmission.
- Textual Criticism is the field of study that tries to re-create the
original text through careful comparisons of copies.
|
|
32
|
- Parchment - treated animal skins
- Vellum - highest quality parchment
- Papyrus - reeds of the papyrus plant glued together to form primitive
paper
- Pen - pointed reed (kalamos)
- Ink - The Greek word literally means “black” - made of charcoal, gum,
and water
|
|
33
|
- Autograph - the original manuscript of a document
- Manuscript (MS) - hand written (the plural is abbreviated MSS)
- Scrolls - a leather roll formed by sewing together squares of parchment
- Codex - book form
- Variants - differences in readings in mss
|
|
34
|
- Visual Copying
- Aural Copying
- Either style of copying
- Mental Errors
- Purposeful Changes
|
|
35
|
- Textual Reconstruction
- Comparison of Manuscripts
- Creation of families and family trees of manuscripts
- Some of the Principles
- Old reading is most likely correct
- Reading from best manuscripts is likely correct
- Reading with widest geographical support is best
|
|
36
|
- About 5000 Greek manuscripts
- Papyri - almost 100 partial mss
- Uncials - almost 300 mss from A.D. 325-950
- Miniscules - about 2000 from A.D. 900-1500
- Lectionaries - about 2800 mss
- Ancient Versions
- Quotations in the Patristic Fathers
|
|
37
|
- Few Manuscripts in general
- Very few prior to A. D. 1000
- Evidence of Jewish quality control in the copying process
- Problem areas in Old Testament Textual Criticism (See “Sacred Words. . .”)
- The contribution of the Dead Sea Scrolls
|
|
38
|
- Hand copying for up to 3000 years
- Thousands of variants
- The New Testament Textual Confidence is based on many manuscripts for
comparison
- The Old Testament Text has few manuscripts for comparison but appears to
have been preserved by careful copying
|
|
39
|
- The Ending of Mark
- The “Woman Taken in Adultery” Passage
- Individual words such as in Romans 5:1 - “we have” or “let us have”
- Content and order of Jeremiah
- Numerous words and phrases in the Old Testament
- Several places where the OT text is very rough, e.g., Samuel, Habakkuk
3, etc.
|
|
40
|
- Biblical Faith at its best has always desired to make God’s Word
available to people in their native language and so parts of the Bible
have been translated since 450 B.C.
- This, of necessity, involves some risk.
Translation is always interpretation!
- No two languages have identical vocabularies or grammars.
|
|
41
|
- Literal – Attempts to translate word for word and grammatical structure
for grammatical structure.
- Dynamic Equivalence – Attempts to translate idea for idea. Its distance from literal depends on
the languages.
- Paraphrase – Attempts to translate impact for impact. Involves the highest degree of
interpretation.
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- A Northwest Semitic language – along with Phoenician,Ugaritic, Aramaic,
and Amorite.
- It was spoken and written primarily in Canaan. More than 99% of the Old
Testament was first written in Hebrew.
- It was built primarily with three consonant roots with various vowels
(not printed), prefixes, infixes, and suffixes.
|
|
44
|
- Ancient Hebrew was written in a script similar to Moabite and other
Canaanite languages.
- Biblical Hebrew is actually written in the characters of Aramaic:
- Gen 1:1-
- ;jerf)fh tÛ")ºw
{éyÙamf<ah tÛ") {yÕiholE) )ØfrfB tyÙi$)"r:B 1
|
|
45
|
- Its vocabulary is concentrated in nouns and verbs. Compared to Indo-European languages it
lacks adjectives and adverbs.
- This means Hebrew is well suited for action based narratives and word
picture poetry. (Sons of thunder)
- It works with abstract ideas and theological distinctions by means of
word imagery and metaphors.
|
|
46
|
- A Northwest Semitic language. It
is very similar to Hebrew and often scholars did not recognize its
existence in the Bible.
- It was the lingua franca of Assyria, Babylon, and Persia in the first
millennium B.C. (Previous
centuries of scholars often called it Chaldee or Chaldean.)
|
|
47
|
- Two words in Genesis 31:47; 1 verse in Jeremiah 10:11; Ezra 4:8-6:18 and
7:12-26; and Daniel 2:4b-7:28 are in Aramaic. The rabbis noted that there was
Aramaic in each of the three parts of the Hebrew canon.
- At least five Aramaic words appear in the New Testament: Cephas,
Tabitha, Maranatha, ephphatha, and talitha cumi.
|
|
48
|
- The cry of Jesus from the cross is preserved in the Gospels in both
Hebrew and Aramaic (transliterated into Greek):
- Hebrew - Matt 27:45:
Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?
- Aramaic - Mark 15:34
Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?
|
|
49
|
- Greek is an Indo-European language.
- The entire New Testament was written in “koine” Greek – the predominate
dialect from about 300 B.C. to A.D. 300.
- Koine Greek was the result of Alexander the Great and his Hellenistic
Empire
- It became the lingua franca from Mesopotamia to Spain for six hundreds
after Alexander.
|
|
50
|
- Greek is highly “inflectional.”
That is basic root words are modified by prefixes, infixes, and
suffixes to create a wide variety of grammatical forms.
- It is rich in adjectives and adverbs and from the Greek philosophers
developed for careful nuances of abstract concepts.
- Koine was not pure Greek but adapted words from many cultures.
|
|
51
|
- Nehemiah 8:8 describes the reading of the Torah in Hebrew and
translating it orally into Aramaic.
- This became standard practice in the developing synagogues. This translation was called a targum. By
the first century targums began to be written.
- Targums were more literal for the Torah and more paraphrase for the
Writings.
|
|
52
|
- The Old Testament was translated into Koine Greek in the 3rd
century B.C. in Egypt. The
process spanned most of the century and is called the Septuagint (LXX).
- Torah was most literally translated, Prophets less so, and the Writings
were paraphrased.
- The Septuagint was the Bible most quoted in the New Testament.
|
|
53
|
- LXX enabled the Old Testament to be read from Mesopotamia to Spain.
- LXX included the Apocrypha.
- Part of the separation of Judaism and Christianity included a
distinction of canons.
Christianity included the Apocrypha, Judaism did not.
- Christians have debated the use of the Apocrypha throughout our history.
|
|
54
|
- The Samaritan Pentateuch
- Rival Greek Versions to the LXX
- The Syriac Peshitta
- Early Latin,Coptic, Armenian, Gothic,and Ethiopic Versions
- The Latin Vulgate – c. A.D. 400 – became the standard Western Bible for
1000 years.
|
|
55
|
- Caedmon, a 7th century (A.D.) stable hand, rendered the
stories of Genesis into ballad form in Old English.
- “The Venerable” Bede apparently made the first written English
translation about A.D. 735. None
of it remains today.
- King Alfred had Psalms translated in the 800s but none survive.
|
|
56
|
- The Wessex Gospels from the 10th century are the oldest
surviving written pieces of an English Bible.
- The first whole Bible in English was done around 1382 under the
influence of John Wycliffe. It
was a translation of the Vulgate and was part of Wycliffe’s desire to
reform the church in England.
|
|
57
|
- 1526 – The New Testament translated by William Tyndale
- 1535 – The first whole Bible printed in English from William Coverdale
- 1537 – Matthew’s Bible edited by John Rogers was the first “authorized”
English Bible
- 1539 – The Great Bible
|
|
58
|
- 1560 – The Geneva Bible – produced by the Puritans – contained notes
explaining its anti-royal translations
- 1568 – The Bishops Bible – produced as a royal alternative to the Geneva
Bible – with notes explaining its anti-Puritan translations.
- 1609 – Rheims-Douai – First Catholic Bible in English, translated from
Vulgate
|
|
59
|
- First published in 1611 to provide an alternative to the Geneva/Bishops’
Bible controversies.
- Not popular initially and went through a number of revisions early on
- By the beginning of the 18th century it had become the
standard English version and maintained that role into the 20th
century
|
|
60
|
- Changes in English language as part of the natural and accelerating
evolution of the language.
- Discoveries of a number of older manuscripts in the 19th
century.
- The discovery of “Koine Greek” through papyrus finds in the late 19th
century.
|
|
61
|
- 1881/5 – The Revised Version
- 1901 – The American Standard Version – very literal
- 1902 – The Twentieth Century New Testament by Weymouth
- 1913/1924 – Moffat’s Bible
- 1935/1939 – Goodspeed’s Bible
- 1946/1952 - Revised Standard Version
|
|
62
|
- 1957/1972 – J.B. Phillips - paraphrase
- 1966 – The Jerusalem Bible – Catholic translation from the French
Version - dynamic
- 1970 – The New English Bible - dynamic
- 1970 – The New American Bible – 1st Catholic Bible from
originals to English - dynamic
|
|
63
|
- 1971 – The New American Standard Bible – the most literal version
currently available
- 1971 – The Living Bible - paraphrase
- 1976 – The Good News Bible - dynamic
- 1978 – The New International Version – dynamic
- 1982 – New Jewish Version – OT - dynamic
|
|
64
|
- 1979/1982 – The New King James Bible –
- dynamic
- 1987 – The New Jerusalem Bible - dynamic
- 1988 – The Revised English Bible - dynamic
- 1989 – The New Revised Standard Version - literal
- 1991 – The New Century Version - dynamic
- 1995 – The New American Standard Bible update - literal
|
|
65
|
- 1996 – The New Living Translation - dynamic
- 2001 – The English Standard Version - literal
- 1993/2002 – The Message - paraphrased
|
|
66
|
- The differing translation philosophies serve differing purposes for the
use of the Bible
- For doctrine, history, and study a literal translation is needed
- For public worship – a readable translation is needed
- For evangelism – a dynamic or paraphrased version is needed
|
|
67
|
- For personal devotion and growth – a range of translation philosophies
are needed
- Serious American Christians should have at least one Bible from each
translation philosophy and should know the most appropriate places to
use each
|
|
68
|
- Missionary need has been the primary motivation for translation of the
Bible.
- This was the case in the early centuries of Christianity
- It continued in Eastern Christianity through the “Dark and Middle Ages”
- The Protestant Reformation brought translation to Western Christianity
for theological reasons
|
|
69
|
- 1519 - Erasmus retranslates a new Latin version.
- 1522 - Luther translates NT into German
- 1530 - Zurich Bible appears in German.
- 1535 - French Neuchatel Bible published
- 1526 - Tyndale translates English NT
- 1535 - Coverdale - whole English Bible
|
|
70
|
- Once again missions is the primary motivation for translation
- Though the majority of people have the Bible in their language the
majority of languages do not
- Wycliffe and other evangelical translation agencies are seeking 2,000
new translations in the next 25 years
|